← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/25855/2019disposed

Sridhar Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

2020-07-24Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.25855 of 2019 ====================================================== Sridhar Ravidas, Son of late Bansi Das, Resident of Village-Bijay Nagar, P.O.-Banka, P.S.-Banka, District-Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Senior Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Consolidation Officer, Drawath, District-Rohtas.

6. The Treasury Officer, District-Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Ms.Smriti Singh, AC to AAG-10 For the AG : Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-07-2020 Once again learned counsel for the petitioner has not joined the proceeding. This is the third occasion on which learned counsel for the petitioner has not attended the case even though this Court has been informed that he has been duly sent the link.

On the last date, this Court had taken note of the information furnished by learned counsel for the State that all the retiral benefits of the petitioner has been paid and he is getting regular pension, therefore, this application has become infructuous. In order to give a last opportunity this Court had fixed the matter for 14th July, 2020 and had made clear that in

Patna High Court CWJC No.25855 of 2019(5) dt.24-07-2020 2/2 case of no response on the next date the matter will be decided on the basis of the materials available on the record. Since, no one has participated in course of hearing on behalf of the petitioner, this Court has reasons to believe that the petitioner has already received his post-retiral dues and is getting his regular pension, hence he is now not interested in pursuing the matter.

This writ application is thus disposed of as having become infructous and as not pressed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) rajeev/arvindU Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.