Kunal Kumar Singh @ Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54522 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2015 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Kunal Kumar Singh @ Kunal Kumar S/o Kritya Nand Singh, R/o Vill.- Bagdobh, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Mantoon Kumar @ Mantun Kumar S/o Amin Singh, 3.

Ranjeet Kumar S/o Ram Narayan Singh, Both Residents of Vill.- Ramdiri Tola Labharchak, P.S.- Matihani, District- Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Shanker Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to O.P.nos. 2 and 3, vide order dated 15.5.2018 passed in S.Tr. No.55 of 2018 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge II, Begusarai.

It further appears that the petitioner had also moved before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge II, Begusarai for cancellation of the bail of the O.P.nos.2 and 3 and that has also been dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge. Grounds for cancellation are that O.P.nos. 2 and 3 were also accused in a earlier case and while the petitioner was coming they threatened him to withdraw the case otherwise to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54522 of 2018(3) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 face the consequences. They are still threatening him. Heard learned APP and from perusal of the impugned order passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge before whom also the petitioner has moved for cancellation of the bail bond of the O.P.nos. 2 and 3, it appears that he has passed detailed order from which it appears that the petition for cancellation of the bail was filed before the CJM on 17.2.2017 and thereafter it was kept pending for one year and thereafter when the charge has been framed the petitioner has prayed for cancellation of the bail and considering the same the learned Addl. Sessions Judge has dismissed the application filed for cancellation of the bail on the ground that there was no justification in cancelling the bail bond of the O.P.nos. 2 and 3.

Considering the discussions as made above, I find no merit in this application. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T