← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77998/2019allowed

Pappu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2020-03-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77998 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2019 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Mahto, aged about 40 years, Male, Son of Chandradeo Mahto 2.

Sarita Devi, aged about 38 years, Female, Wife of Pappu Mahto, both resident of Village Bakarchak, P.S. - Manikpur, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Devendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P.S. Case No. 192 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

According to the first information report, the prosecution case in short is that the informant was married with co-accused Indrajeet Mahto on 03.12.2017 by giving gift in cash etc. It is said that after marriage, the informant went to her Sasural but on 11.02.2019, the accused persons with common intention started torturing, used to assault, stopped fooding and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77998 of 2019(3) dt.06-03-2020 2/2 used to demand of dowy and on 25.04.2019 ousted from the matrimonial house.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners are Nanad and Nandosi of the victim. He further submits that they are residing at village- Basauni and they have no knowledge about the second marriage of Indrajit Mahto and they have no concern with the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioners have got no any criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P.S. Case No. 192 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T