Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1333 of 2024 ====================================================== Urmila Devi W/o Sri Suresh Prasad Yadav, R/o village and P.O - Simarwara, P.S.- Patepur, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division Muzaffarpur. 3.

The Director, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Director, Welfare, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali.

6.

The District Program Officer, Vaishali.

7.

The Child Development Project Officer, Patepur, Vaishali. 8.

Smt. Pinki Kumari, W/o Pramod Kumar Rai, R/o village and P.O - Simarwara, P.S. - Patepur, District - Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. i) To quash the order dated 07.05.2022 passed in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 321/2019//40/202021 by the Collector Vaishali whereby and whereunder the appeal of the petitioner has been rejected. A copy of order dated 07.05.2022 is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure-1 to this application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1333 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 (ii) To further direct to the respondent authority to issue the selection letter on the basis of merit list. And / or any other appropriate relief(s) to the petitioner for which he may be found entitled under the fact and circumstance."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U