Shatrudhan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78710 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2019 Thana- JAMHOR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Shatrudhan Kumar S/o Dashrath Saw, Resident of village- Shankarpur, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No.39 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
The petitioner has two criminal cases, one is of similar nature and 76 litres of country made liquor has been recovered from his motor cycle. He has surrendered before the court below on 25.10.2019 and since then he is in jail custody. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78710 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Aurangabad in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No.39 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of offence, the relief granted to the petitioner in the present case will be treated to have been withdrawn.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T