Chakravarty Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85202 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-347 Year-2024 Thana- NEMDARGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Chakravarty Kumar S/o Late Dinesh Singh @ Dinesh Prasad Singh Resident of Village- Lakhmohna, P.S.- Nemdarganj, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
3.
The prosecution case in short is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons have assaulted the informant and his family members.
4.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. Injury on the prosecution side was found to be simple in nature.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85202 of 2024(2) dt.03-01-2025 2/2 Several persons from the accused side also got injured and out of them, one has sustained grievous injury which is apparent from the injury report of accused side which is annexed as Annexure P/3 of the bail application. There is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 05.11.2024.
5.
Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.
6.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and period of custody of the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Nemdarganj P.S. Case No. 347 of 2024. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T