← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4293/2024allowed

Pancha Yadav @ Panchanand Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-17Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4293 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2017 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Pancha Yadav @ Panchanand Yadav Son of Mahajan Yadav Resident of village - Kalyanpur, P.S. - Bhore, District - Gopalganj, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shekhar Singh Mr. Avinash Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Informant :

Mr. Anand Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioner in collusion with co-accused, Ramdhyan Pandey, have committed murder of informant's son and informant's relative son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4293 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2 the police after investigation has submitted final form against the petitioner, thereafter, the present case proceeded based on protest filed by the informant against the police investigation. And, thereafter, the learned Court below took cognizance against the petitioner. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 336 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T