← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17347/2018dismissed

Kumari Priyanka Gupta @ Priyanka Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-09-28Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17347 of 2018 ====================================================== Kumari Priyanka Gupta @ Priyanka Devi Wife of Vikash Kumar Gupta @ Vikash Kumar Prasad, Resident of Barvavrit, P.O.- Metchua Jalalpur, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 3.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Esttb.), Gopalganj. 5.

The C.D.P.O., Kuchaikot, P.O. and P.P.S. Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. 6.

Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Jalalpur, P.O.- Jalalpur, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj.

7.

Kaushalya Devi, Wife of Sri Dhananjay Prasad Gupta, Resident of Barvavrit, P.O.- Metchua Jalalpur, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyama Kant Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap -GP 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-09-2020 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this application, this application has rendered infructuous, as Respondent no. 7 has been appointed. In such view of the matter, the petitioner should be given liberty to challenge the appointment of Respondent no.7. In view of the above submission, this application is dismissed as infructuous with the liberty, if so like, the petitioner may take legal step as per law whereby she may

Patna High Court CWJC No.17347 of 2018(2) dt.28-09-2020 2/2 challenge the appointment of Respondent no. 7. This order has been passed in presence of Mr. Gyan Shankar AC to GP 2 and Mr. Mohan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Respondent no. 6.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U