Md. Irfan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76808 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-915 Year-2018 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== MD. IRFAN ANSARI Son of Mansur Ansari Resident of Village-Aurai, P.O.- Kajhai, P.S.-Sanjhauli, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar 2.

Amina Khatoon Wife of Md. Irfan Ansari Daughter of Sultan Ansari Resident of Village-Aurai, P.O.-Kajhai, P.S.-Sanjhauli, District-Rohtas at present resident of village-Gobina, P.O-Karup Indrahiya, P.S.-Sasaram Mufassil, District-Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad For the Informant Mr. Pratyushs Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 01-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rohtas Complaint Case no. 915 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the D.P. Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members have tortured in various ways due to nonfulfillment of further demand of dowry and finally they ousted her from matrimonial home after snatching her belongings. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the informant and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76808 of 2019(4) dt.01-11-2021 2/3 been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the informant. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that opposite no. 2 is ready to lead the conjugal life. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready to keep his wife, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rohtas Complaint Case no. 915 of 2018 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

It is further directed that at the time of filing bail bond, petitioner as well as as opposite party no. 2 will appear

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76808 of 2019(4) dt.01-11-2021 3/3 before the learned lower court and assert that they have amicably settled their dispute and are ready to lead the conjugal life together.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T