Dr. Veena Kumari @ Veena Singh @ Veena v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Home Deptt. Govt. Of Bihar At Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1869 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-900 Year-2019 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Dr. Veena Kumari @ Veena Singh @ Veena Daughter of Vinay Kishore Singh and Wife of Santosh Kumar, Resident Ajanta Colony, Road No. 4, Rajeev Nagar, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Home Department Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

2.

The S.P. Patna.

3.

The S.H.O. P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. 4.

Dr. Shailesh Kumar Mukul son of Not Known Resident of Village - 107, Type 4, Block 1, Aiims Residential Complex, AIIMS, Patna. Permanent Address - Doctors Colony, Gaushala Road, P.S.- Siwan (Muffasil), DistrictSiwan. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Pd. Singh, Advocate Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to G.P. 5 for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking quashing of the First Information Report being Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No. 900 of 2019 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the facts and circumstances appearing from the records particularly the first information report showing that there are allegations against the petitioner and the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1869 of 2019(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 case is still under investigation, this Court finds no reason to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction to scuttle the investigation at this stage. Since the investigation is still going on, this Court is not recording any observation on the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. Let the investigation be completed and in case the petitioner would be aggrieved by the investigation and further action it will be open for the petitioner to seek her remedy in accordance with law.

The writ application stands disposed off.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/ved U T