Vinay Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82086 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Vinay Ram Son of Late Hargen Ram Resident of Village - Nanhakar, P.S. - Suppi, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per F.I.R., informant alleged that this petitioner, along with co-accused Vishal Kumar, took his son towards mango orchard and thereafter, shot him dead.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that specific accusation of killing the deceased by firing is against co-accused Vishal Kumar. So far as this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82086 of 2025(4) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 petitioner is concerned, he is only alleged to be driving the motorcycle on which co-accused Vishal Kumar was riding and there is absolutely no allegation of overt act against this petitioner. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 01.02.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, fact that petitioner is not assailant of the deceased and period of custody, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 178 of 2024. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T