Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5119 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2019 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar, Son of Umesh Sah, Resident of Village- Abjuganj, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Usha Kumari-1, S.PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2019 Appellant seeks bail in connection with Sultanganj P. S. Case No. 110 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 448, 354B, 379, 504 of IPC and Sections 3(I) (X) of SC/ST Act.

As per F.I.R. there is allegation of using explicit language and pulled the daughter of the informant and he abused the informant and other and also snatched Rs.50,000/- from him.

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the allegation is false and concocted and the allegation of snatching and outraging the modesty is ornamental in nature. The appellant is in custody for more than six months. Heard learned Special P.P. for the State, also. Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5119 of 2019(2) dt.25-11-2019 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, this appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 18.09.2019 is set aside. Let the appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sultanganj P. S. Case No. 110 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the appellant shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned with condition not to threaten the informant and his family members or try to tamper with the evidence.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T