← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17879/2018disposed

Saukhi Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17879 of 2018 ====================================================== Saukhi Singh, Son of late Chaturi Rai, Resident of Village-Haldi Chapra, P.O.-Maner, P.S.-Maner, District-Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Deputy Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of BIhar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Magadh University through its Vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodhgaya.

5. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodhgaya.

6. The Finance Officer Magadh University, Bodhgaya.

7. The Patliputra University through its Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna.

8. The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna.

9. The Principal, Ramkrishna Dwarika College, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadaw, GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by a judgment of the coordinate Bench of this Court reported in 2018(3) PLJR 1029 rendered in the case of Akhilanand Singh & ors. vs. State of Bihar & ors. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent nos. 4 & 6 explaining as to how this case is covered by the aforesaid

Patna High Court CWJC No.17879 of 2018 (2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 judgment rendered by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Akhilanand Singh (supra) within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent nos. 4 & 6 shall take a final decision within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

If the respondent nos. 4 & 6 find that the case of the petitioner is fit for absorption, consequential benefits shall be granted within a period of eight weeks of passing of the final order.

The writ petition is disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U