Sri Sachidanand Choubey And ORS v. The State Of Bihar, Through Sri Binay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Dep

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3354 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8590 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Sri Sachidanand Choubey Son of Late Purusotam Nath Choubey, Resident of Village-Binod Matihania, Police Station-Bishambharpur, DistrictGopalganj, Presently Posted as Nalkup Khalasi Under P.H. Disvision, Gopalganj.

2.

Sri Ganga Sagar Singh, Son of Late Keshwar Singh, Resident of VillageBharkhar, Police Station-Brahmpur, District-Buxar Presently Posted as Nalkup Khalasi Under P.H. Division, Gopalganj. 3.

Sri Rabindra Manjhi, Son of Late Charitar Manjhi, Resident of VillageHaradian, Police Station-Baikunthpur, District-Gopalganj Presently Posted as Nalkup Khalasi Under P.H. Division, Gopalganj. 4.

Hare Krishna Yadav, Son of Late Lakhu Yadav, Resident of VillageBalathara, Police Station-Kuchaikot, District-Gopalganj, Presently Posted as Nalkup Khalasi Under P.H. Division, Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through Sri Binay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri Satish Chandra Mishra, The Engineer-in-Chief, P.H.E.D., Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Dharmendra Kumar, The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

4.

Sri Ali Haidar, The Executive Engineer, P.H. Division, Gopalganj. 5.

Sri Raj Kishore Mahto, The Superintending Engineer, P.H. Circle, Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.S. Raza Ahmad AAG-5 Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5 For the Accountant General :

Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025 The learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted by referring to the second supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposites No. 2 to 4 that all the admissible retiral /

Patna High Court MJC No.3354 of 2018(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/2 service benefits have already stood paid to the petitioners and they are also getting their current pension, as would be apparent from the pension / gratuity payment orders, annexed to the said second supplement show cause.

2.

This Court finds that no rejoinder has been filed by the petitioners, hence it is apparent that the order of this Court dated 11.5.2018, passed in CWJC No. 8590 of 2018, has stood complied with. Nonetheless, the petitioners are granted liberty to avail such remedies as are otherwise available under the law in case of any subsisting grievances.

3.

Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U