Navin Kumar @ Navin Singh @ Navin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82485 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2019 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== NAVIN KUMAR @ NAVIN SINGH @ NAVIN KUMAR SINGH Son of Ramnivas Sharma @ Ram Janam Singh Resident of Village- Samsara, P.S.- Main (Pai Bigha O.P.), District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking regular bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25 (1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to disputed piece of land and village politics. It is further submitted that no arms or ammunition has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, therefore, no case under sections of Arms Act is made out against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82485 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2019 2/2 Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as it appears that the petitioner is named in the FIR as the person who has assembled with his muscle man on the disputed piece of land lashed with arms and surrounded the house of the informant and thereafter police reached there and the persons started fleeing away whereupon this petitioner was arrested and from his possession one country made pistol with three live cartridges were recovered as also that this petitioner is having as many as 8 cases on his head and a substantial number of those cases are under Arms Act, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Release of the petitioner in the present case at this stage is likely to interfere with the course of trial.

Let the trial be expedited.

Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after a reasonable period.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/ved U T