Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83586 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-512 Year-2024 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/o- Rajesh Kandu Saw @ Rajesh Kandu Resident of villageBhadauni Beldari Purani Beldari PS- Town Thana Distt- Nawada State- Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurav Barial, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard Mr. Saurav Barial, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narsingh Tanti, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 512 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the order of the learned trial court, it is clear that the victim has given her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83586 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 statement wherein she has stated that she went with the petitioner on her own free will and also married him. It has also been submitted that, as the victim herself has stated that she has gone on her own free will, the allegations under Sections 363 and 66A are not made out against the petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 19.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 512 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T