Anish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55669 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -885 Year- 2017 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Anish Kumar Son of Horil Prasad @ Horil Bhagat, resident of village - Basudeo Chhapra, P.S. Minapur, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 885/2017, instituted for the offences under Sections 401, 414, 420, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 20(b) of N.D.P.S. Act.
It is alleged in the written report that 1kg Ganja has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that 1kg Ganja comes under the category of small quantity. The petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2017.
Keeping in view the period of custody of the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55669 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 885/2017, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner with further conditions that petitioner shall present on each and every date in court fixed by the court below and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and valid reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner. The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T