Jeevan Singh @ Jeebachh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84706 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- Lalamnia District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Jeevan Singh @ Jeebachh Singh S/O Late Murait Singh Resident of Village - Birpur, P.S- Lalmaniya,Dist- Madhubani 2.
Sanjay Kumar Singh S/O Late Murait Singh Resident of Village - Birpur, P.S- Lalmaniya,Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Jha Raman, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Lalmaniya P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109(1), 303(2), 351(2)(3), 352 of the BNS lodged on 10.07.2025 by the informant.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioners is that they have assaulted the son of the informant for demanding fare of Gage machine which was give on rent to the petitioners. The informant and his wife was also assaulted by the petitioners inflicting injuries upon them. Accordingly, the FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84706 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are said to be agnates and there is a case and counter case between the parties and a case bearing Lalmania PS Case No. 39/2025 has been lodged against the informant side. The injuries sustained by the informant and her family members are simple in nature. From perusal of the injury report, it is apparent that the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the fact that there is a case and counter case between the parties as stated above and the injuries are simple in nature, there is no specific allegation against these petitioners and they have got clean antecedent, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with aforesaid PS Case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84706 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 3/3 well as the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U T