Meer Gazzali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78127 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== MEER GAZZALI S/O Sri Humayun Ansari R/O Mohalla - Nasirpur (Bagicha), P.S. - Bihar, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar 2.

Huma Kaushar D/O Md. Parwez Alam R/O Hajju Kumhar Toli, P.O. and P.S. - Bihar, District - Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Parasmani For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/323 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep opposite party no.2 with care and dignity.

No one appears for the opposite party no.2 despite valid service of notice.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78127 of 2019(3) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Mahila Police Station Case No. 136 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T