Satyendra Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19472 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.
Satyendra Kumar Verma Son of Late Ramanand Prasad, Resident of VillageSansarpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Khagaria. 2.
Shailendra Kumar Sinha @ Ghanshyam Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ramanand Prasad, Resident of Village- Sansarpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Khagaria.
3.
Nirmala Devi, Wife of Sajjan Paswan, Resident of Village- Sansarpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Khagaria.
4.
Komal Kumari, Wife of Govind Kumar Paswan, Resident of VillageSansarpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Khagaria. 5.
Chanda Kumari, Wife of Janak Paswan, Resident of Village- Mahda, Police Station- Maheshkunt, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Magistrate, Khagaria, District- Khagaria. 3.
The Additional Collector, Khagaria, District- Khagaria. 4.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms (DCLR), Khagaria, District- Khagaria. 5.
The Circle Officer, Khagaria, District- Khagaria. 6.
Dilkhush Kumar, Son of Sunil Sah, Resident of village- Hardaschak, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Khagaria.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Wasi Ahmad Khan, Adv.
Mr. Thakur Brajesh Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Government Pleader (14) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to approach Bihar Land Tribunal under the provisions of Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 to challenge the final order passed by the D.C.L.R., Khagaria in
Patna High Court CWJC No.19472 of 2025(2) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 Measurement Appeal Case No. 8 of 2023-24.
2. Considering the above prayer, the instant writ application stands disposed of with giving the petitioners aforesaid liberty. If they file an application before the Bihar Land Tribunal then the period spent by the petitioners in this writ petition shall be excluded while computing the necessary limitation period.
(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U