Sachcha Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19185 of 2024 ====================================================== Sachcha Lal Yadav Son of Ganga Ray, Resident of Panapur, P.S.-Akilpur, Patna 800012.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna-800001.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Government of Bihar, At Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

3.

Managing Director, Bihar State Awas Board, Govt. of Bihar, At Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.

4.

Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board, Patna Division-3, Bahadurpur, Housing Colony, Patna-800026.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amalendu Shekhar Thakur, Advocate Mr. Shivendu Harihar, Advocate For the State :

Government Pleader (24) For BSHB :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate Mr. Dhaneshwar Vashisht, Advocate Mr. Utsav, Advocate Mr. Sarvesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1. (i) For quashing the notice no. 714 dated 14-11-2024, issued by the Respondent No. 4, as contained in Annexure- P1 along with all notices and proceedings connected with the same.

(ii) For issuance of directions to the respondents to restrain from harassing the petitioner by intending to illegally demolish

Patna High Court CWJC No.19185 of 2024(2) dt.19-12-2024 2/2 the house of the petitioner.

(iii) For directing the respondents to stop harassing the petitioner without any fault and restrain them from engaging in discrimination on the basis of some illegal and baseless complaint regarding existence of khatal.

(iv) For directing the respondents to restrain from illegally passing further order to harass the petitioner without any material evidence against him."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U