Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77160 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2019 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAJESH YADAV, Gender- Male, aged about 30 years, Son of Bhulan Yadav. 2.

Asha Devi, Gender-Female, aged about 55 years, wife of Bhulan Yadav. 3.

Bhulan Yadav, Gender-Male, aged about 60 years, son of Bali Yadav. 4.

Heeramati Devi, Gender- Female, aged about 25 years, wife of Rajesh Yadav.

5.

Santosh Yadav, Gender-Male, aged about 25 years, son of Bhikham Yadav. All are resident of Village - Ranha Bin Toli, P.S.- Pujahan Patjirwa, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No. 7, advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Chanpatiya P.S. Case No. 231 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 498(A) and 314/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation has been made that the marriage of the informant was solemnized with Ramesh Yadav according to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77160 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/3 Hindu law and in the marriage her father gave cash Rs.2,51,000/- to her in-laws. After some time, the informant became pregnant, which was informed by her but, thereafter, all the family members started demanding Rs.1,00,000/- and one bullet motorcycle from the father of the informant. When the demand was no fulfilled, they forcibly administered wrong medicine to the informant, on that account, her pregnancy has been terminated.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner no.1 is the brother-inlaw, petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law, petitioner no.3 is the father-in-law, petitioner no.4 is the sister-in-law and petitioner no.5 is the cousin brother-in-law of the informant. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Chanpatiya P.S. Case no.231 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77160 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 3/3 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T