Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83899 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- JURAWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Satish Kumar Son of Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Ray Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur 2.
Mukesh Kumar son of Prabhash Rai @ Sukkan Rai Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur 3.
Avinash Kumar Rai @ Avinash Rai son of Late. Prakash Chandra Rai @ Teman Rai Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur 4.
Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Rai son of Late. Prakash Chandra Rai @ Teman Rai Resident of Village -Raghopur Pashchami PS -Jurawanpur District -Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Ritesh Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-03-2026 Pre-arrest bail application with regard to petitioner no. 4 has already been withdrawn vide Order no. 2 dated 06.01.2026.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State.
3. Petitioner nos. 1 to 3 apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(1), 191(3), 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83899 of 2025(3) dt.17-03-2026 2/2
4. As per F.I.R., petitioner nos. 1 and 2 assaulted informant with iron rod and petitioner no. 3 assaulted brother of the informant by means of iron rod. Injuries caused by petitioner nos. 1 & 2 are simple in nature while injury caused by petitioner no. 3 is grievous.
5. In view of the fact that petitioner No. 3 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 3 is refused.
6. However, considering the nature of accusation and injuries, the anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner Nos. 1, 2 is allowed and it is ordered that the above named petitioner Nos. 1, 2 in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Jurawanpur P. S. Case No. 142 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T