Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1941 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2024 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Pintu Kumar, S/o- Yogendra Yadav, Resident of Village- Fairda, P.S.- Safiya Sarai, District-Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 Heard Mr. Rabi Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Piribazar P.S. Case No. 48 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant along with his family members was going on e-rickshaw from Abhaipur Railway Station and near Kothia Tal, four persons on three bikes intercepted them and took away valuables and mobile. It is also stated by the informant that he can identify the accused persons.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1941 of 2025(4) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 named in the F.I.R. rather his name has surfaced during the course of investigation. It has further been submitted that in this case, three mobiles were recovered from the possession of this petitioner, but those mobiles are different from the mobiles which are alleged to have been taken away by the accused persons. It has also been submitted that no T.I.P. was conducted in this case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.04.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Lakhisarai in connection with Piribazar P.S. Case No.48 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T