Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Sirji v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83607 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Sirji Son of Rajkumar Singh Resident of VillageTerasiya (Ward No. 01), P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali at Hajipur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Mahasweta Sinha, Police Inspector-cum-SHO, Saran Mahila P.S., Chapra841301 Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Saran- Mahila P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 79, 111, 141, 143, 145, 98, 296 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 along with Sections 13 and 14 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children Act), Sections 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and Section 16 of the Bounded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83607 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 2/3
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner is alleged to have running an orchestra. It is alleged that from a room, three minor girls were apprehended. They also told that the petitioner is the proprietor of the orchestra.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of investigation, the victims have given their statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS that they are working in an orchestra and they want to go to their houses. Save and except this, nothing is against the petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 15.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83607 of 2025(2) dt.10-12-2025 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) Saran at Chapra in connection with Saran-Mahila P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T