Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3144/2024dismissed

Md. Ekramul v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3144 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2022 Thana- ANGARGHAT District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Ekramul S/O Mohammad Abdul Barik R/O VILLAGE - DAULATPUR, P.S. - WARISNAGAR, DISTRICT - SAMASTIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rana Sanjay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, motorcycle borne criminals looted Rs. 7,22,000/- on the gun point from a Bolero Pick-up vehicle.

4. Though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but the involvement of the petitioner has been surfaced during investigation and the materials have come to connect the petitioner with the crime including confessional statement of coaccused.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3144 of 2024(2) dt.31-01-2024 2/2 the petitioner that the petitioner is in jail since 12.07.2023 and no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade yet.

6. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner is accused in six more cases of similar and serious nature and he is a veteran criminal of the area.

7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, considering the serious nature of crime and considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application for regular bail is dismissed.

8. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases registered against the petitioner/s.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Judge, Samastipur through FAX for its compliance forthwith.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T