← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60988/2018disposed

Anil Singh @ Jai Prakash @ Jai Prakash Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2026-01-31Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60988 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2017 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Anil Singh @ Jai Prakash @ Jai Prakash Singh Son of Kamlesh Singh, Resident of Village- Hat Pokhasr Jitaura, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State of Bihar.

2.

Daiyzee Singh @ Babita, S/o Sidh Nath Singh, Resident of Mithapur, Indira Nagar, Road No.-3, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Pandey, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present Cr. Misc. Application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 19.04.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ist, Bhojpur, Ara in Sessions Trial No.700 of 2018 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No.210 of 2017 by which cognizance was taken against the petitioner and others under Sections 376, 420, 120(B) of the I.P.C. and issued the summons against the petitioners to appear before the Court.

3. As per the report submitted by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara vide letter No.4157 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60988 of 2018(2) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 2025 dated 30.08.2025, the Sessions Trial No.700 of 2018 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No.210 of 2017 has already been disposed of on 18.08.2023.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Sessions Trial No.700 of 2018 arising out of Piro P.S. Case No.210 of 2017 has already been disposed of and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays that the present case may be disposed of.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and the report submitted by the concerned Court, the present Cr. Misc. Application stands disposed of having become infructuous.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T