← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18404/2018dismissed

Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2024-01-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18404 of 2018 ====================================================== Kunal Kumar Son of Late Basant Das Resident of Mohalla-Dharam Samaj Chowk,Ward No.13, Jamla Road, P.O.+ P.S. Motihari, Town, Distt.-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, Distt.-Compassionate Committee, East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-4 Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for issuance of mandamus for grant of compassionate appointment to the petitioner because father of the petitioner died during service period in the year 2016 particularly on 29.03.2016.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner was in service in District

Patna High Court CWJC No.18404 of 2018 dt.08-01-2024 2/3 Consumer Forum, at East Champaran, Motihari, working as Head Assistant. During service he died on 29.03.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 06.09.2016 in the office of the District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, District Compassionate Committee, East Champaran, Motihari. His request for compassionate appointment was rejected by the officials on the ground that the elder brother of the petitioner was in service and having earning being employee in Union of India. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the elder brother is detached himself from the family and not looking after and, as such, the present case is fit to be allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, filed the counter affidavit and submits that as per the guideline of the General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, vide Letter No.15783 dated 19.11.2014 as well as in the light of case decided in CWJC No.6668 of 2003 and CWJC No.7044 of 2003 disposed of on 27.07.2014 any member of the family of the deceased employee is gainfully employed, then compassionate appointment is not permissible.

5. Here in the present case, it transpires from

Patna High Court CWJC No.18404 of 2018 dt.08-01-2024 3/3 Annexure-A that policy guideline has already been framed, according to which, the petitioner is not fit for compassionate appointment. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.01.2024 Transmission Date NA