← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86198/2024bail granted

Vishal Kumar @ Bablu Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-12-18Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86198 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-974 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Vishal Kumar @ Bablu Manjhi S/O Soharai Manjhi R/O Mohalla- Ander Bairagi, P.S.- Delha, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 974 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 125 litres of country made liquor was recovered from bag near the bushes at Manpur Station out of which 25 litres was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86198 of 2024(2) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 that recovery is from an open place, which is accessible to one and all. The petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024 and has got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Muffasil PS Case No. 974 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T