Triveni Malakaar @ Triveni Kumar Ranjan @ Triveni Malakar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79535 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2019 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

TRIVENI MALAKAAR @ TRIVENI KUMAR RANJAN @ TRIVENI MALAKAR AND ORS Son of Saryug Prasad Resident of Ward No.8 Bihpur, Police Station- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur. 2.

Ranjeet Kumar @ Abhay Raj Son of Triveni Malakaar @ Triveni Kumar Ranjan Resident of Ward No.8 Bihpur, Police Station- Bihpur, DistrictBhagalpur. 3.

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar Ranjan Son of Triveni Malakaar @ Triveni Kumar Ranjan Resident of Ward No.8 Bihpur, Police Station- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Viveka Nandsingh For the Informant :

Mr. Chandan Kumar Kashyap Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the State :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding scuffle having taken place in between the petitioners and the prosecution party on account

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79535 of 2019(2) dt.17-01-2020 2/3 of washing of a motorcycle whereupon it is stated that the petitioners had assaulted the informant and others. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that the injury report would bear it out that the injury which has been caused on the person of the injured is simple in nature. It is further submitted that the present case arises out of case and counter case, the case filed on behalf of the petitioners being earlier in time.

Per contra, the learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, I deem it fit and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79535 of 2019(2) dt.17-01-2020 3/3 A.C.J.M. 1st, Naugachia in connection with Bihpur P.S. Case No. 275 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T