Madhusudan Mahto @ Masudan Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.57898 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2018 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Madhusudan Mahto @ Masudan Mahto S/o Late Narayan Mahto resident of Village - Chhoti Ballia, P.S. Ballia, District - Begusarai.
2. Manohar Ram S/o Siban Ram @ Shivam Ram resident of Village - Janipur Naya Tola, P.S. - Ballia, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 10/2018, registered for offences punishable under Section 20b of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.
Allegation is of recovery of 13 kilo and 200 grams of ganja from the possession of the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and in fact nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the recovered quantity is less than the commercial quantity and he has been in judicial custody since 22.05.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57898 of 2018 (2) dt.28-09-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Begusarai, in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 10/2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T