Nitesh Yadav @ Nitesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82492 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2024 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== Nitesh Yadav @ Nitesh Kumar Yadav S/o Birendra Yadav @ Virendar Chaudhari R/o Village - Daraila, P.S - Guthni, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Ms. Kumari Anupam, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 310 (2) of the B.N.S..
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 25.10.2024 , at around 7 PM, 6 miscreants entered the shop of the informant with deadly weapons and on the point of pistol, committed loot of Rs. 55,000/-. It is further alleged that the present occurrence occurred in presence of co-accused Sohan Mali.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82492 of 2025(3) dt.13-03-2026 2/3 committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Name of the petitioner transpired during investigation on confessional statement of other co-accused persons. No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of petitioner. It is further submitted that similarly situated coaccused person, namely Dhananjay Sah, having similar and identical allegations, has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 06.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85000 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, claim based on parity and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Siwan in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82492 of 2025(3) dt.13-03-2026 3/3 with Guthani P.S. Case No. 298 of 2024 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T