Sanjay Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2323 of 2020 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar, Son of Surendra Pathak, Resident of Village-Bhagwatpur, Police Station-Taraiya, District-Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 3.
The Academic Director, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 4.
The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra. 5.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra. 6.
Sri Mangal Prasad Singh, Ex-Secretary, Prabhu Nath Jamadar High School, Pokhraira, P.O. and Police Station-Taraiya, District-Saran at Chapra. 7.
Jitendra Prasad, Son of Mangal Prasad Singh, Clerk, Prabhu Nath Jamadar High School, Pokhraira, P.O. and Police Station-Taraiya, District-Saran at Chapra.
8.
Prem Kishore Upadhyay, Convenor, Prabhu Nath Jamadar High School, Pokhraira, P.O. and Police Station-Taraiya, District-Saran at Chapra. 9.
Sarita Singh, at present working as Headmistress, Prabhu Nath Jamadar High School, Pokhraira, P.O. and Police Station-Taraiya, District-Saran at Chapra.
10.
The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Saran at Chapra, through its Presiding Officer.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Narendra Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadav ( Gp23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the District Appellate Authority has rejected his claim on the ground that the District Appellate Authority has no power to adjudicate the matter of petitioner. He submits
Patna High Court CWJC No.2323 of 2020(5) dt.07-05-2024 2/2 that against the said order, he seeks permission to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.
3.
Permission is granted.
4.
However, the State Appellate Authority is directed to condone the delay in filing of the appeal and decide the appeal in accordance with law.
5.
This writ application is hereby disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U