Ajay Ram @ Banela v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88310 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- THAWE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ajay Ram @ Banela son of Raju Ram Ro village -Miralipur PS-Thawe, DistGopalganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 379, 506, 34 of IPC 3.
Allegedly, all accused persons including the petitioner came to the informant having armed with deadly weapons and started abusing. On objection, all accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members. Petitioner assaulted the informant's brother by means of iron rod. One co-accused person snatched gold chain from the neck of brother of the informant.
4.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88310 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is fairly submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant's brother and injury was found to be grievous in nature. Both the parties are gotiyaa of each other and there is land dispute between them. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application and has been languishing in custody since 03.09.2024.
5.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and period of custody of the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Thawe P.S. Case No. 36 of 2023. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T