Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82472 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2024 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Raushan Kumar S/o Late Sanjay Yadav @ Late Sanjay Kumar R/o vill - Korai, P.S.- Deepnagar, Distt.- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Suryakant Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard Mr. Suryakant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 97 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 66(C), 66(D) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000 lodged on 14.02.2024.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that upon knowledge about the accused resorting to cyber crime, the place was raided, some of the accused arrested which include the petitioner and number of mobile phones and other incriminating materials have been recovered/seized. This led to the FIR.
4. In this case, some of the accused is juvenile, were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82472 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 granted relief in the year, 2024 itself.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they used to take processing fee from one Dhani Finance but the police implicated them only because of criminal antecedent. Last submission is that he is in custody since 21.09.2025.
6. Learned APP opposes the prayer stating that as per the allegation that they resorted to cyber crime.
7. Considering the submissions of the parties as also that he has remained in custody since 21.09.2025, other accused who were found juvenile already extended relief, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.
8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Hilsa, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 97 of 2024 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82472 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for one year to mark his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T