Dinesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85872 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2024 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Mandal S/O Satya Narayan Mandal R/O Vill.- Udhampur Ward No 05, P.S-Chhatapur, Dist-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 93 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 137(2), 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Accusation against the petitioner is of abduction of informant's daughter with ill intentions.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner and victim are relatives and this petitioner never kidnapped the informant's daughter but as a matter of fact, she left her house on her own sweet will as the informant used to torture her daughter to get
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85872 of 2024(3) dt.27-02-2025 2/2 married. Learned counsel further submitted that medical report does not support the case of the prosecution. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 29.08.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita has supported the allegations as levelled in the FIR. He further submitted that police after investigation submitted charge-sheet under Sections 83, 87, 127(4), 137(2) of the BNS.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also Section 183 BNSS statement of the victim, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T