Tripurari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1266 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-351 Year-2023 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Tripurari Prasad SON OF JAGNARAYAN PRASAD VILLAGELAHLADPUR, P.S.- GOURICHAK DIST.- PATNA 2.
PHULA DEVI @ FULKUMARI DEVI WIFE OF TRIPURARI PRASAD VILLAGE- LAHLADPUR, P.S.- GOURICHAK DIST.- PATNA 3.
KISHORE PRASAD @ KISHOR KUMAR SON OF TRIPURARI PRASAD VILLAGE- LAHLADPUR, P.S.- GOURICHAK DIST.- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jitendra Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-02-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, the petitioners and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and her husband by means of deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries. All the accused persons looted ornaments worth Rs.10,000/- and Dipu Kumar tore the clothes of the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1266 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the informant and petitioner's side are family members and there is no specific overt act against them. The specific allegation is against the coaccused Dipu Kumar, Prahlad Kumar and Pawan Kumar. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Gourichak P.S. Case No.351 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T