Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87605/2025bail granted

Sujit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-15Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87605 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Sujit Kumar S/o Bilash Yadav R/o Village - Pranpur, P.S - Amas, District - Gaya 2.

Chandan Kumar S/o Shambhu Yadav R/o Village - Pranpur, P.S - Amas, District - Gaya 3.

Shankar Yadav S/o Rajdeb Yadav R/o Village - Pranpur, P.S - Amas, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioners seeks bail who is in custody since 09.09.2025 in connection with Aamas P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 29.04.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 329(4), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 29.04.2025 when his nephew came to visit him

2/4 in his ice factory, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons came and assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and they falsely been implicated in the present case. Although the petitioners are named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted the informant and his family members received injury but the injury report of the injured persons suggest that injury inflicted upon them is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance and similarly situated co-accused person, namely, Shambhu Yadav has been granted the privilege of bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 75611 of 2025. The police after investigation submitted charge-sheet and the petitioners are in custody since 09.09.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner nos.1 & 2 have clean antecedents and petitioner no.3 has got four criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner no.3 is on bail in the pending

3/4 matters.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, injury inflicted upon the injured persons is simple in nature and similarly situated co-accused person has been granted the privilege of bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court , let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Aamas P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

4/4 cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T