Md. Imran v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82443 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-487 Year-2023 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MD. IMRAN Md. Basir @ Mohammad Vasir R/o Village- Oilabad, P.SHayaghat, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363/365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Petitioner is said to have abducted and committed murder of the son of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been named in the First Information Report and he has been made an accused in this case only on the basis of confessional statement made by the co-accused. It has further been submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the persons who were named in the FIR being Vikash Kumar Pandey and Sangeet Kumar @ Bluetooth have both been granted bail vide orders
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82443 of 2025(3) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 dated 02.05.2025 and 28.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 229 of 2025 and Cr. Misc. No. 75293 of 2025 respectively. It has further been submitted that the name of one Pravesh Kumar was also taken in the confessional statement against whom the allegation is much graver than the petitioner and he has also been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide an order dated 25.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38210 of 2025. Further, the petitioner is in custody since 04.07.2025 and till date even charges have not been framed.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the other accused persons named in the FIR and also named in the confessional statement have been granted bail by coordinate Benches of this Court coupled with the fact that the charge-sheet as against the petitioner has already been submitted, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 487 of 2023, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82443 of 2025(3) dt.18-02-2026 3/3 conditions that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date and cooperate in getting the charges framed as the same has been done in the case of other accused persons.
7. The learned court concerned is directed to proceed with the case of the petitioner expeditiously without giving any unnecessary adjournments and get the charges framed.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T