Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84205 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- Patarghat District- Saharsa ====================================================== Babloo Kumar Son of Late Nand Kishore Mehta R/o Village - Rajganj Tharaha Tola, Ward no. 13, P.S. - Bihariganj, Distt. - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard Mr. Rahul Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Patarghat P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the driver of the informant informed that unknown miscreants have taken away Rs. 9,10,000/- from his vehicle.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of this petitioner has come during the course of the investigation. The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with other co-accused persons, including the driver of the said pickup of the informant,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84205 of 2025(2) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 have planted a conspiracy to commit robbery. It has also come out during investigation that in view of the confessional statement of this petitioner, Rs. 3,70,000/- were recovered from the house of one Lakhan Mehta. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner and the conspiracy was hatched by the driver himself, who has also been made an accused in this case. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 05.08.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Patarghat P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T