Md. Kamaruddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18346 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Kamaruddin Ansari Son of Md. Sharfuddin Ansari, Resident of Village and P.O.- Bhagwanpur Hat, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
2.
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra. 5.
The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Saran at Chapra. 6.
The Block Education Officer, Baniyapur-2, District- Saran. 7.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sri Krishna Ranjan For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Smt. Shilpa Singh- Ga12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard the parties.
Following relief has been sought for in paragraph 1 of the present application on behalf of the petitioner: "1. That the present writ petition is being filed for issuance of writ of MANDAMUS for commanding and directing the authorities for payment of pension, gratuity, leave encashment and other emolument with
Patna High Court CWJC No.18346 of 2018(7) dt.22-09-2020 2/2 statutory interest at market rate and additionally in interest on delayed payment from date of entitlement to date of actual payment with litigating cost for unnecessary harassment and for other necessary relief/reliefs on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case."
On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ application has been redressed by the respondents.
Considering the same, the present writ application stands disposed of.
In case, if any further relief still remains to be redressed by the respondents, the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a representation before the competent authority who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U