Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82378/2025bail granted

Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-02Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82378 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Raj Kumar S/O Hareram Paswan R/O Village- Vidyapur (Husainabad) Ward No. 3, P.s.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 459 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 41.250 liters of country made liquor was recovered from basement hall of the petitioner house. Petitioner was arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82378 of 2025(2) dt.02-12-2025 2/2 no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged liquor was recovered from under constructed house and no family members are residing in the same, rather it is an open place, which is accessible to one and all. The petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2025 and has got clean antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 459 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) krishnakant/- U T