Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86174/2024dismissed

Md. Danish v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-27Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86174 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Danish S/O Muturja Ali Resident of village - Bahadurpur Ward No- 16, P.S- Mehsi, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased on that basis he has been made accused in this case. He submits that there is specific overt act against the petitioner. He submits that on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the petitioner was not present there rather he is doing job in the city of Kolkata for his livelihood. He further submits that petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86174 of 2024(3) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 27.08.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State and informant oppose the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024.

7. However, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T