Lallu Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58759 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2018 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Lallu Bind, Son of Bijendra Bind, Resident of Village- Mansa Bigha, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State .

The petitioner seeks bail in Hilsa P. S. Case No. 99 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 498A and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is the husband of the informant.

There is allegation in the written report that petitioner used to commit torture with the informant for demand of dowry. It is further alleged that due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry accused persons including this petitioner forcibly snatched the ten months old daughter of the informant and threw her on the ground on account of which she died. It is further alleged that the dead body was not handed over to the informant by the accused persons as named in the written report.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58759 of 2018(3) dt.19-11-2018 2/2 Thereafter, in course of search, some of the co villagers told that dead body of the daughter of the informant was buried in Chirari ( cremation ground). The dead body was exhumed from the cremation ground and handed over to the police. Case diary has been received, wherein, the postmortem report of the deceased is available.. The doctor has mentioned in the postmortem report that death has occurred due to head injury caused by hard and blunt substance. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Petitioner is given liberty to renew prayer for bail after nine months in the event the trial is not concluded (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T