Nebal Kumar @ Nawal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84572 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2019 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== NEBAL KUMAR @ NAWAL KUMAR Son of Rajendra Sah Resident of Village - West Telihar, P.S.- Beldaur, Distt - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is recovery of stolen motorcycle from the abandoned hut of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner had purchased this motorcycle after making payment and he was not aware that said motorcycle is stolen one. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.09.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84572 of 2019(2) dt.19-12-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 176 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T