Veer Kumar @ Gorakh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83223 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Veer Kumar @ Gorakh Son of Chhotelal Ram Village - Nokha, P.S. - Nokha, Distt. - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 329(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

03. As per prosecution case, in the background of enticing the girl from the family of the petitioner, the petitioner and other co-accused persons attacked the house of the informant and this petitioner opened fire with country made katta, causing injury in the right thigh of the nephew of the informant. Other family members of the informant also received injuries in the hands of their assailants.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83223 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 2/3

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties and Nokha P.S. Case No. 91 of 2025 has been lodged by the mother of the petitioner with allegation of assault on petitioner and other co-accused persons by the informant side. Learned counsel further submits that there is specific allegation of opening fire against this petitioner and nephew of the informant receiving gun shot injury, however, the injury report of nephew of the informant shows two lacerated wounds in right thigh and right gluteal region and the doctor gave opinion that injuries are simple in nature and are caused by hard and blunt object. This falsifies the allegation of opening fire against the petitioner. Other allegations are against other co-accused persons. The petitioner is having antecedent of three cases and is on bail in all those cases. The petitioner is in custody since 29.08.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the case and counter case of the parties and further considering the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83223 of 2025(2) dt.08-12-2025 3/3 nature of injuries allegedly caused by the petitioner and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Sasaram at Rohtas/court concerned in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T