Rangnath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83545 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== Rangnath Yadav, Son of Parshuram Yadav @ Pashuram Yadav, Resident of village - Chhotki Nainijor, Police Station - Nainijor, District - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Arun, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.104 of 2024, dated- registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation, 90 bags of rice was removed from the godown and loaded in a truck standing outside the godown by breaking the windows. The case was lodged against unknown persons by the Assistant Manager of the government godown.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR was lodged against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83545 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 unknown persons and the Petitioner was neither owner nor driver of the vehicle. He also submits that he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and the case against the Petitioner is based only on suspicion and there is no concrete material against him.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Buxar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.104 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83545 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 3/3 2023 and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T