Pramod Yadav @ Rahman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84980 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2024 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1.
Pramod Yadav @ Rahman Son of Baljit Yadav R/o Village - Maheshpur, P.S. - Saur Bazar, Dist. - Saharsa.
2.
Anil Kumar @ Mantun Yadav @ Matan Yadav Son of Prithwi Yadav R/o Village - Chandpur Pachchimi, P.S. - Saur Bazar, Dist. - Saharsa. 3.
Bigan Yadav Son of Jagdev Yadav R/o Village - Bali Barsam, P.S. - Balwa Hat, Dist. - Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on recovery of dead body of a woman, buried under the ground, instant F.I.R. was registered against the unknown.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners are distant relatives of the deceased and they have been made accused in this case during investigation. Petitioners
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84980 of 2025(2) dt.09-12-2025 2/2 are separate in mess and property and they are not concerned with family affairs of the deceased. It is further submitted that co-accused Mulo Devi, who is mother-in-law of the deceased, has already been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 17.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66636 of 2025. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Saharsa in connection with Saur Bajar P. S. Case No. 427 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T