Guddu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77173 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2019 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== GUDDU KUMAR Son of Gajendra Rai Resident of Mohalla - Nasriganj Digha, P.S. - Digha, District - Patna. ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 356/379of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's name has come in the case on the confessional statement of co-accused Sagar Kumar who was apprehended on the spot and there is no direct allegation against the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate XIV, Patna in Gandhi Maidan Police Station Case No. 373/2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77173 of 2019(2) dt.17-02-2020 2/2 and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T