Bablu Singh @ Abhay Narayan Kumar @ Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.646 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2023 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Bablu Singh @ Abhay Narayan Kumar @ Bablu Kumar S/o Vinay Singh Resident of Village -Tepa, P. S.- Tekari District Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mohit Shriwastava, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 Heard Mr. Mohit Shriwastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 160 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 09.03.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. According to prosecution case, petitioner is said to have fired upon the daughter of the informant due to which the victim died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.646 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand, on the basis of material available on record and case diary has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from a bare perusal of the FIR it appears that the petitioner is the main assailant and he has fired upon the victim due to which she died and medical evidence also supported the case of the prosecution apart form that the petitioner carries two cases other than the present one.
6. Considering the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R and the material available on record, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 160 of 2023 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6th Gaya.
7. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U T